Elmualim, A A and Govender, K (2008) Communities of practice in UK large contracting firms: Contrasting application and non-utilized merits. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 4(3-4), pp. 149-159. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
The idea of a community of practice (CoP) has been offered as the engine to unlock the potential of organizational resources, mainly knowledge and people, to achieve the strategic goal of sustained competitiveness. The relevance and application of CoPs in large UK contracting companies was investigated using two case studies. Contrasting variations in the understanding of the concept between the two contracting companies were observed. While a CoP was applied in one company with strategic intent, the concept was not fully understood in the other. In one company, only a third of CoP members surveyed agreed that CoPs were a vehicle for driving best practice and innovation throughout the business; this compared with more than 60% in agreement in the other contracting firm. The higher agreement and satisfaction of CoP members in the latter case study was the result of the management's understanding and commitment. CoPs require time and organizational support to mature. The strategic inception and management support of CoP application is vital for their maturation and progress. Although the construction industry change discourses portray CoPs as fostering an environment of trust, and hence serving as innovation and competiveness enablers, their potential contribution to contracting firms does not provide a compelling case and hence merits further research studies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | communities of practice; contracting firms; groupthink; knowledge management; situational learning; trust |
| Index terms: | commitment, case study, communities of practice, satisfaction, construction industry, knowledge management, variation, best practice, competitiveness |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, market analysis, contractual condition, professional development, knowledge management, project delivery, psychology, data collection methods, business |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here