Hasselaar, E (2009) Health issues and the building stock. Building Research & Information, 37(5-6), pp. 669-678. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The impact of housing on many aspects of inhabitants' health has been recognized and enshrined in legislation since the late 19th century in many countries. The improved housing quality in many European countries between 1900 and 1940 contributed immensely to reducing the burden of disease. However, no dwelling is without health hazards. In the past, health hazards tended to be diagnosed for individual houses. An alternative approach is provided that studies the total housing stock to categorize and identify those parts of the stock at highest risk. This can be used to inform policy and strategy on prevention and remediation of specific health hazards. The key research question is: how can housing stock be categorized on the basis of health hazards? A method for the categorization of the housing stock is presented. The history of housing standards and construction methods in the Netherlands along with expert health knowledge based on individual dwellings is used to identify categories with specific hazards. Building type, construction, tenure and age band are important parameters for categorization. A top-down argument is presented, leading to the identification of key issues for public health policies for the housing stock as a whole.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building stock; dwellings; evidence-based strategy; health risk; housing policy; housing stock; public health; the Netherlands |
| Index terms: | strategy, housing, public health, evidence, health risk, tenure, Netherlands, legislation, housing stock, prevention, health hazard, housing policy, building stock, construction method, history |
| Subjects: | asset management, legal systems, management, industry analysis, evaluation and assessment methods, environmental health, architectural and construction history, building construction, Geography, real estate economics, construction type, financial risk, environmental hazards, public policy |
| Topics: | Site Management, Cost Management, Governance, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Urban Studies, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here