Decarbonizing national housing stocks: Strategies, barriers and measurement

Lomas, K J (2009) Decarbonizing national housing stocks: Strategies, barriers and measurement. Building Research & Information, 37(2), pp. 187-191. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Many nations have set tough targets for reducing the CO2 emissions of their building stocks. The Building Research Information special issue titled 'Climate Change: National Building Stocks' (2007) (volume 35, number 4) describes policy instruments, stock management approaches, and energy supply strategies proposed in a number of counties. Two contrasting propositions for reducing emissions from the UK's housing stock, both based on modelling studies, are discussed in this commentary. One is based on extensive stock management, including increased demolition rates, rigorous energy-efficiency measures, embedded renewable energy generation, and a supportive population. The other is based on the multiplication of more modest improvements in all these areas together with decarbonization of the central electricity supply. Broader sustainability considerations cast doubt on the merits of increased demolition rates, and studies using measured data demonstrate the complex interactions that can occur between embedded energy conversion technologies and the energy supply infrastructure. The commentary highlights some of the barriers to achieving deep cuts in emissions from housing stocks. These need to be examined closely in future research. Equally importantly, there is a need for extensive nationwide monitoring campaigns in order to plan decarbonizing strategies properly and to assess their impact.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building stock; carbon dioxide reduction; carbon intensity; climate change; demolition; housing policy; zero-carbon homes
Index terms: CO2 emissions, building research, efficiency, conversion, strategy, carbon dioxide, housing stock, building stock, housing policy, population, monitoring, renewable energy, climate change, policy instrument, modelling, interaction
Subjects: performance management, management, manufacturing engineering, research management, asset management, demography, behavioral psychology, industry analysis, policy studies, air quality, control systems, climate science, public policy, analytical methods, energy systems
Topics: Governance, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Site Management, Quality Management, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here