Lowe, R (2009) Policy and strategy challenges for climate change and building stocks. Building Research & Information, 37(2), pp. 206-212. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Issues raised by the papers in the Building Research Information special issue titled 'Climate Change: National Building Stocks' (2007) include the need for an explicitly engineering vision of low-energy and low-carbon futures, the need to develop detailed, dynamic models of the interactions between building stocks and energy supply systems, the importance of data in supporting both the development and the implementation of roadmaps to low-carbon futures, the likely role of micro-generation in low-carbon futures, and the phenomenon of rebound and its implications for energy-efficiency technologies. There appears to be consensus on all but the last two. This paper proposes three alternatives to Saunders' formulation of the Khazzoom-Brookes postulate, based on the view that rebound is only likely to be a problem if energy-efficiency improvements are implemented in the absence of a carbon cap. The paper ends by reviewing the interactions between regulatory and economic environment, culture and technology, and their potential impacts on energy use and carbon emissions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building stocks; climate change; demolitions; energy consumption; energy efficiency; low carbon; policy measures; rebound effect |
| Index terms: | interaction, building research, climate change, strategy, efficiency, policy measure, energy efficiency, energy use, implementation, energy consumption, rebound effect, carbon emission, building stock, low carbon |
| Subjects: | sustainability and energy, policy studies, sustainability assessment, performance management, economic analysis, management, research management, climate science, contractual arrangements, asset management, energy systems, behavioral psychology |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Quality Management, Governance, Procurement, Research Practice, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here