Comparing European residential building stocks: Performance, renovation and policy opportunities

Meijer, F; Itard, L and Sunikka-Blank, M (2009) Comparing European residential building stocks: Performance, renovation and policy opportunities. Building Research & Information, 37(5-6), pp. 533-551. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Greater potential energy savings can be achieved in the large stock of existing dwellings than in the relatively small proportion of newly built dwellings. Although the energy performance of existing dwellings is much poorer than new dwellings, the stock of existing dwellings is very large in a 'mature' built environment of most developed countries. In the past decade, awareness of the potential energy savings has spread widely among the many stakeholders involved. Nonetheless, most regulations and instruments are still aimed at achieving sustainable newly built construction. An evidenced-based overview of the current state of the residential building stock is provided for eight northern European countries along with current renovation data. Comparisons are made on the characteristics, physical quality and developments of the residential building stock. Existing policies and incentives to reduce energy use and CO2 emissions are analysed for their impacts on the existing building stock as well as the barriers preventing successful sustainable renovation. Common denominators in the current state of renovation of residential building stock are used to identify possible future instruments and incentives that are needed to overcome current barriers.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building quality; building stock; energy performance; energy policy; energy savings; housing policy; renovation; sustainability; thermal quality
Index terms: energy policy, built environment, renovation, regulation, residential building, building stock, developed country, energy performance, CO2 emissions, energy use, energy-saving, housing policy
Subjects: renovation and retrofit, development economics, public policy, asset management, energy systems, air quality, political science, construction type, infrastructure and transport systems
Topics: International Construction, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Urban Studies, Governance
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here