Criteria for salvageability: The reuse of bricks

Nordby, A S; Berge, B; Hakonsen, F and Hestnes, A G (2009) Criteria for salvageability: The reuse of bricks. Building Research & Information, 37(1), pp. 55-67. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Bricks can be regarded as an environmentally beneficial building material only over the whole life cycle. Its high durability fulfils the demand for environmental payback. However, since a long component lifetime also implies different uses, the design and construction should enable the potential for reuse. This Norwegian study investigates how component design and different construction methods influence the salvageability for reuse in order to avoid down-cycling. The results show that the single brick itself has great potential as a reusable component. Simplicity and small scale provide a unique architectural flexibility, which increases the potential for a second service life. Regarding brick constructions, the most important parameter is the choice of connectors. The lime-based mortar used in historical buildings is far more flexible than the cement mortar commonly used today, and recent developments point to a reintroduction of limes. On the other hand, the use of bolted connections can make mortar-less masonry possible, but this approach may lead to sub-optimization in achieving overall environmental goals.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: brick; brickwork; building materials; design for disassembly; Norway; reuse; salvageability; service life; waste reduction
Index terms: payback, brickwork, mortars (material), construction method, building material, small scale, whole life cycle, design and construction, bolted connection, lime, historical building, Norway, durability, service life, design for disassembly, waste reduction
Subjects: architectural elements, production management, asset management, contractual arrangements, material degradation and durability, building materials, economic analysis, structural engineering, sustainability assessment, Geography, building construction, sustainability and energy, construction type
Topics: Construction Technology, Project Management, Procurement, Site Management, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Construction Materials, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here