The ecological crisis and self-delusion: Implications for the building sector

Rees, W E (2009) The ecological crisis and self-delusion: Implications for the building sector. Building Research & Information, 37(3), pp. 300-311. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The world is on the brink of an unprecedented growth-related ecological crisis that could well undermine prospects for global civilization. Nevertheless, the global community seems 'in flight from thinking' about the implications of the threat and unwilling to contemplate the policy remedies necessary to change the course of history. Biological and cultural factors combine to inhibit clear understanding and effective corrective action. Mainstream 'solutions' - hybrid cars, green buildings, smart growth, the new urbanism - are thus rooted in denial and delusional. These approaches do not address the fundamental problem of 'overshoot', but rather attempt to maintain the growth-bound status quo through efficiency gains and related technological 'fixes'. This might actually worsen the situation. Achieving sustainability requires that such marginal reform give way to a complete rethink of society's relationship with nature. Developed societies need a new, more adaptive cultural mythology. The building sector arguably has greater material leverage in reducing the human ecological footprint than any other major industrial sector. Acceptance of the guidelines developed in this paper would revolutionize the industry and reorient it geographically. The question is: does the industry have the intellectual courage and practical momentum to assume a lead role in the sustainability campaign?

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: behaviour; built environment; climate change; cognitive behaviour; cultural narratives; ecological overshoot; sustainable development
Index terms: ecological footprint, narrative, built environment, green building, history, climate change, efficiency, society, sustainable development, urbanism
Subjects: architectural and construction history, climate science, environmental impact, communities and social development, infrastructure and transport systems, performance management, design practice, cities and urban places, qualitative and interpretive research, health safety and environment
Topics: Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Quality Management, Design Practice, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 2 CT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here