Rijal, H B; Humphreys, M A and Nicol, J F (2009) Understanding occupant behaviour: The use of controls in mixed-mode office buildings. Building Research & Information, 37(4), pp. 381-396. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
A mixed-mode building is heated in winter, free running in mid-season, and has cooling available in summer as required. It is likely to use less energy than a fully air-conditioned building. However, the energy consumption of a mixed-mode building depends greatly upon how the occupants use the available controls, such as windows, fans, heating, and cooling. Hitherto, for the purpose of building thermal simulation, rather arbitrary assumptions have often been made about occupant behaviour. Using thermal comfort field data sets from Europe and Pakistan that include mixed-mode buildings, the occupant behaviour with regard to the building controls is analysed. The results indicate that the mixed-mode buildings were generally controlled as if they had been naturally ventilated buildings, but with the provision for cooling if needed, rather than as normal air-conditioned buildings. Equations are developed to relate the probability of using the various controls to the indoor and outdoor temperature, and to relate the indoor comfort temperatures to the outdoor temperature. Such equations may be useful for estimating comfort and energy use.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptive behaviour; behaviour; comfort; energy efficiency; mixed mode; occupants; thermal comfort |
| Index terms: | energy efficiency, summer, winter, adaptive behaviour, building control, mixed method, thermal comfort, energy use, Pakistan, Europe, occupant behaviour, energy consumption, comfort, window, office building, estimating |
| Subjects: | occupational health and safety management, health behaviours and lifestyles, health safety and environment, human factors, architectural elements, data collection methods, energy systems, environmental engineering, financial and cost management, construction type, Geography, sustainability and energy, physical geography and landforms, climate science |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Design Practice, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here