Delivery and performance of a low-energy ventilation and cooling strategy

Short, C A; Cook, M and Lomas, K J (2009) Delivery and performance of a low-energy ventilation and cooling strategy. Building Research & Information, 37(1), pp. 1-30. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

There is an appreciable literature exploring environmental design strategies for low-energy, naturally ventilated and cooled buildings, but less is recorded about their implementation in practice. The commissioning and monitoring of the passive downdraught-cooled UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES), London, is reported. The building contractor, his suppliers and subcontractors experienced considerable difficulty in achieving defect-free environmental systems, adversely affecting the practical delivery of the strategy for an extended period. The design team was closely involved throughout this period to assist in establishing a stable controls regime reflecting the design intent. However, this intent was itself modified by feedback provided by monitoring. The widely used professional appointment and construction contracts employed for this project do not envisage the need for such extensive commissioning. However, it is argued here that the new generation of advanced naturally ventilated buildings, much encouraged by policy-makers worldwide, will require just such a comprehensive commissioning exercise to deliver anything like their full designed performance.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building performance; commissioning; feedback; monitoring; natural ventilation; passive downdraught cooling; procurement; project delivery; sustainable construction
Index terms: environmental design, design team, natural ventilation, strategy, sustainable construction, London, commissioning, monitoring, implementation, project delivery, ventilation, subcontractor, building contractor, construction contract, building performance, exercise
Subjects: environmental engineering, project delivery, Geography, contractual arrangements, contract type, quality assurance, sustainability and energy, completion, control systems, air quality, management, health behaviours and lifestyles, practitioner, sustainable construction, professional practice
Topics: Roles and Professions, Health and Safety, Site Management, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Quality Management, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here