Wilhite, H (2009) The conditioning of comfort. Building Research & Information, 37(1), pp. 84-88. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
This commentary considers how the insights from the Building Research Information 2008 special issue on 'Comfort in a Lower Carbon Society' impact upon our understanding of the nature of comfort demand; their importance and relevance to the theory and policies of building comfort; and the commentary draws upon changing comfort practices in other parts of the world. One of the most important contributions of the collection is to situate comfort historically and technically, but also to give attention to the social consequences of air-conditioning. Air-conditioning has brought with it an encapsulation of home within house and has led to significant changes in the social geography of home and neighbourhood. The social, material and discursive facets of air-conditioning are globalizing at a rapid pace, fostered by the spread of inappropriate building practices, faith in modern scientific solutions to achieving comfort, and new ideas about the human body. Local knowledge about climate and comfort is waning in many parts of the world, and cooling comfort increasingly relegated to technical experts. This collection makes an important contribution to understanding how air-conditioning has become pervasive and suggests new lines of thinking in the crucial effort to move towards a less carbon-intensive comfort regime.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptive behaviour; agency; air-conditioning; comfort; consumerism; energy demand; occupant satisfaction; social geography; sustainable consumption |
| Index terms: | agency, society, energy demand, local knowledge, building research, building practice, adaptive behaviour, consumption, occupant satisfaction, comfort |
| Subjects: | user-centered design, human factors, communities and social development, building construction, occupational health and safety management, consumer economics, sociology, energy systems, research management |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Design Practice, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here