Ascione, F; Bellia, L; Mazzei, P and Minichiello, F (2010) Solar gain and building envelope: The surface factor. Building Research & Information, 38(2), pp. 187-205. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Harnessing the appropriate radiative characteristics of buildings' external surfaces is a highly effective way to reduce internal space heating and cooling demand. Building energy-dynamic simulations are created in order to compare various external coatings with reference to a social housing case study in a typical Mediterranean climate (Naples, Italy). An innovative index, the surface factor (SF), is proposed to inform the choice of the most suitable surface coatings as a function of local climatic conditions and thereby reduce overall energy demand. For cities with high solar gain and/or low winter degrees-day (SF > 0.65), high-reflective and/or high-emissive coatings (i.e. 'cool paints') are suitable, while low-reflective and/or low-emissive external coatings are more suitable for cooler climates (SF < 0.4). The simultaneous interactions of wall mass, surface radiative characteristics, and indoor ventilation on the summer cooling energy demands are evaluated and substantial heating or cooling savings can be achieved, particularly for existing buildings. For regions in which outdoor night temperature is lower than the indoor value, high thermal inertia walls are viable only when coupled to night ventilation. Diurnal ventilation coupled to massive walls was found to be energy inefficient.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building envelope; building physics; external surfaces; surface coatings; thermal comfort; thermal inertia |
| Index terms: | thermal comfort, savings, case study, winter, summer, climatic condition, building envelope, internal space, Italy, interaction, ventilation, energy demand, coating, social housing |
| Subjects: | air quality, housing and residential development, building materials, energy systems, environmental engineering, behavioral psychology, Geography, economic analysis, architectural elements, data collection methods, climate science, specialized design |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Urban Studies, Construction Materials, Design Practice, Sustainability, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here