Lou, E C W and Goulding, J S (2008) Building and construction classification systems. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 4(3-4), pp. 206-220. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Within the construction industry, there is an increasing demand for information, especially with constantly changing products, technological developments and solutions pervading the marketplace. In this context, the idea of an 'ultimate classification system' has often been seen as a misnomer, or a bridge too far. While it is acknowledged that a multiplicity of different classifications exist around the world, the incongruent and disparate nature of them could (and should) be revisited. This would help to provide clarity and unity (if nothing else) and presents a more holistic view of existing classification systems in order to provide the basic rubrics for future classification systems.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building; classification; classification systems; construction |
| Index terms: | construction industry |
| Subjects: | industry analysis |
| Topics: | Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 1 T |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here