Building human agency: A timely manifesto

Cole, R J; Brown, Z and McKay, S (2010) Building human agency: A timely manifesto. Building Research & Information, 38(3), pp. 339-350. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The 2009 Passive and Low Energy Architecture Conference (PLEA), held in Quebec City, Canada, was themed 'Architecture, Energy and the Occupant's Perspective', with the ambition of positioning building inhabitants as key 'active' determinants of energy performance in 'passive' design through adaptive opportunities. Conference delegates committed to a Manifesto that embodied both the key longstanding priorities of PLEA and explicitly conveyed the priorities of the conference hosts. The Manifesto is examined in terms of how it captures and represents a shift in thinking that has occurred over the past few years, away from technological and technocratic solutions to comfort provisioning and towards reframing building energy consumption as a social and ethical challenge in which comfort plays a key role.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adaptive behaviour; agency; comfort; comfort provisioning; indoor environmental quality; inhabitants; manifesto; passive and low energy architecture conference
Index terms: comfort, indoor environmental quality, adaptive behaviour, building energy consumption, low energy, conference, Canada, agency, energy performance, determinant
Subjects: energy systems, environmental health, human factors, risk assessment, Geography, research dissemination and communication, sociology, occupational health and safety management, sustainability and energy
Topics: Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here