Darby, S (2010) Smart metering: What potential for householder engagement? Building Research & Information, 38(5), pp. 442-457. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The argument for the implementation of 'smart' metering, which is an elastic term, varies according to circumstance and place. In some countries, the business case for establishing an advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) relies in part on improving consumption feedback to customers and assisting in the transition to lower-impact energy systems. There is an expectation that AMI will lead to reductions in both the demand and the cost to serve customers through improved communication, but little evidence exists to show overall demand reduction. To what extent might smart meters improve the prospects for customer engagement? To assess this question, end-user perceptions and practices must be considered along with metering hardware and economics. Using the theory of affordances, qualitative research is examined to understand how householders have used consumption feedback, with and without smart meters. Although AMI offers possibilities for household energy management and customer-utility relations, there is little evidence to suggest it will automatically achieve a significant reduction in energy demand. For that, there has to be a determined focus on overall demand reduction (rather than on peak electricity demand reduction), on designing customer interfaces for ease of understanding, and on guiding occupants towards appropriate action. Appropriate forms of interface, feedback, narrative, and support will be needed to reach diverse populations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | affordances; behaviour; energy demand; energy management; feedback; households; housing; human agency; smart metering |
| Index terms: | energy management, housing, electricity demand, business case, affordance, implementation, consumption, agency, hardware, evidence, energy system, qualitative research, population, household, narrative, smart meter, energy demand |
| Subjects: | qualitative and interpretive research, behavioral psychology, sociology, demography, computer hardware, consumer economics, research design and methodology, evaluation and assessment methods, construction type, strategic project management, contractual arrangements, energy systems, sustainability and energy |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here