Challenges for energy and buildings research: Objectives, methods and funding mechanisms

Oreszczyn, T and Lowe, R (2010) Challenges for energy and buildings research: Objectives, methods and funding mechanisms. Building Research & Information, 38(1), pp. 107-122. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

This commentary reflects on a series of strategic questions facing the energy and buildings research community and research funding bodies in the UK. These include the problems of research capacity and funding, the need to find a new balance between competition and cooperation between research groups, and a need for a renewed focus on the empirical performance of buildings. The authors argue that conventional distinctions between research, development and the deployment of technologies are inappropriate for the built environment. A wider range of approaches to research is needed to enable researchers to engage more effectively with stakeholders throughout the research, development, and deployment process, to reduce the distinction between research and knowledge transfer, and to reduce the length of learning cycles. Without such developments, there is a risk that the energy and buildings research community will be reduced to commenting on accelerating developments in the real world and, at the same time, an increased risk that the massive investments currently being envisaged in the refurbishment and decarbonization of the built environment will underperform.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildings; climate change; de-carbonization; energy; knowledge transfer; public policy; research policy; trends
Index terms: research policy, public policy, cooperation, climate change, funding, competition, built environment, research funding, knowledge transfer
Subjects: research management, market analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, public policy, psychology, economic analysis, research dissemination and communication, climate science, economic and policy analysis
Topics: Governance, Sustainability, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Urban Studies, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here