Pink, S; Tutt, D; Dainty, A and Gibb, A (2010) Ethnographic methodologies for construction research: Knowing, practice and interventions. Building Research & Information, 38(6), pp. 647-659. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Ethnographic methodologies developed in social anthropology and sociology hold considerable promise for addressing practical, problem-based research concerned with the construction site. The extended researcher-engagement characteristic of ethnography reveals rich insights, yet is infrequently used to understand how workplace realities are lived out on construction sites. Moreover, studies that do employ these methods are rarely reported within construction research journals. This paper argues that recent innovations in ethnographic methodologies offer new routes to: posing questions; understanding workplace socialities (i.e. the qualities of the social relationships that develop on construction sites); learning about forms, uses and communication of knowledge on construction sites; and turning these into meaningful recommendations. This argument is supported by examples from an interdisciplinary ethnography concerning migrant workers and communications on UK construction sites. The presented research seeks to understand how construction workers communicate with managers and each other and how they stay safe on site, with the objective of informing site health-and-safety strategies and the production and evaluation of training and other materials.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction site; construction workers; ethnographic research; indigenous knowledge; informal practices; knowledge in practice; local knowledge |
| Index terms: | manager, strategy, construction site, sociology, journal, ethnography, methodology, migrant worker, local knowledge, construction worker |
| Subjects: | management, research methods, social theory, qualitative and interpretive research, communities and social development, research dissemination and communication, practitioner, work location |
| Topics: | International Construction, Site Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here