Two models for benchmarking UK domestic delivered energy

Summerfield, A J; Lowe, R J and Oreszczyn, T (2010) Two models for benchmarking UK domestic delivered energy. Building Research & Information, 38(1), pp. 12-24. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

From publicly available data, two simple models are developed to help identify the trajectory of total delivered energy to UK households and provide benchmarks for the UK domestic sector. Both models can help to inform policy-makers and the public whether delivered energy in the domestic sector is on track and whether the reductions correspond with the expected impact of a more efficient domestic sector. The annual delivered energy, price, and temperature (ADEPT) model uses multiple linear regression to fit consumption data since 1970 (R2 = 0.76). Findings indicate that with typical recent heating season temperatures of 7°C and at 2005 energy prices, average household delivered energy is estimated at 21.7 MWh (95% confidence interval = 20.8, 22.6). For every 1°C increase in heating season temperature, average household delivered energy drops by approximately 1 MWh/year. Energy price elasticity is estimated at -0.2, so that a 50% rise in energy prices corresponds to an approximate 10% decline in energy demand. To fit quarterly delivered energy data since 1998, a seasonal temperature energy price (STEP) model is also developed using polynomial multiple regression (R2 > 0.99). At 2005 energy prices, the average household has a minimum power demand of 1.2 kW (including approximately 0.4 kW electricity) at about 16°C, which rises as external temperatures drop to 5°C, where it begins to plateau at approximately 3.8 kW. The average heat loss coefficient is estimated at 240-320 W/°C. Both models find no evidence to date to indicate that changes in delivered energy are beyond those expected due to variations in external temperature and energy price. The seasonal model also provides benchmarks for delivered energy as a response to external temperature and energy price that will be useful for a comparison of building performance evaluations with the national stock, without requiring data for a whole year.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building stock; domestic stock; energy demand; energy efficiency; energy performance; housing; models
Index terms: household, building performance evaluation, energy efficiency, consumption, variation, energy demand, confidence interval, energy performance, housing, benchmarking, building stock, evidence, multiple-regression
Subjects: construction type, statistical analysis, contractual condition, asset management, consumer economics, performance measurement, sustainability and energy, demography, energy systems, evaluation and assessment methods, building performance
Topics: Sustainability, Urban Studies, Research Practice, Quality Management, Contract Administration, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here