Summerfield, A J; Pathan, A; Lowe, R J and Oreszczyn, T (2010) Changes in energy demand from low-energy homes. Building Research & Information, 38(1), pp. 42-49. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
To measure change in energy demand, a follow-up study was conducted in 2005-2007 of 36 'low-energy' UK dwellings that were originally monitored for hourly energy consumption between 1989 and 1991. All results were compared under standardized daily external winter conditions of 5°C. Overall, no significant evidence of change over 15-17 years was found in average gas consumption (67 kWh/day, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) = 55, 79) and average electricity usage (14 kWh/day; 95% CI = 11, 18). Dwellings were then classified into low, middle, and high groups according to energy usage in 1990. Gas usage of the high group at follow-up was 107 kWh/day (95% CI = 89, 125) in 2005-2007, and was consistent with increased floor space, but electricity consumption increased by 72% to 24 kWh/day (95% CI = 18, 30). The high group comprised dwellings that were both larger originally than in the other groups and they were more likely to have been extended. These results are broadly consistent with national statistics that show a distribution of household energy expenditure increasingly skewed towards those on highest incomes. Findings suggest that efficiency measures remain effective over the medium-term, but once implemented, little further improvement is made by occupants. Energy policy should focus on households with the highest consumption as this is where potential reductions are greatest and increases in gas and electricity usage are most are likely to occur.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | behaviour; buildings; domestic; energy; energy demand; energy performance; longitudinal study; time |
| Index terms: | energy-expenditure, winter, efficiency, energy demand, energy policy, income, energy consumption, household, confidence interval, evidence, consumption, energy performance, statistics, electricity consumption |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, energy systems, public policy, climate science, consumer economics, mathematical modelling, evaluation and assessment methods, statistical analysis, demography, performance management |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here