Thomas, L E (2010) Evaluating design strategies, performance and occupant satisfaction: A low carbon office refurbishment. Building Research & Information, 38(6), pp. 610-624. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Existing buildings present the best opportunity for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in developed economies, given that only 2-3% of the building stock is newly built each year. Insights from a post-occupancy evaluation of a large-scale refurbishment project of a head office building in Sydney, Australia, are presented to inform future refurbishment strategies. The study evaluates occupant satisfaction and energy performance, and elicits influencing factors arising from the design process and interventions, ongoing building management, and operational performance. Occupants returned a high level of satisfaction across the range of environmental variables for overall comfort, temperature, lighting, and air quality as well as perceived productivity and health. These outcomes highlight the importance of improving indoor environmental quality for occupants particularly through increased fresh air, daylight, glare control, access to views, and noise management. The positive results reinforce the value of an integrated and user-responsive approach that was adopted for building design, development, and management. The reduction in operational energy (in this project, coupled with carbon reduction) as a consequence of refurbishment and positive user feedback demonstrates the potential to future-proof existing buildings in the context of climate change.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptation; climate change; comfort; energy; indoor environmental quality; integrated design; occupants; post-occupancy evaluation; refurbishment |
| Index terms: | climate change, energy performance, refurbishment project, indoor environmental quality, comfort, occupant satisfaction, glare, greenhouse gas emission, air quality, office building, low carbon, adaptation, Australia, strategy, post-occupancy evaluation, productivity, building stock, satisfaction, design strategy, carbon reduction, design process, building design, influencing factor, building management |
| Subjects: | design methods, climate science, construction type, risk assessment, user focus, user-centered design, energy systems, evaluation methods, architectural design, project delivery, Geography, infrastructure engineering, sustainability assessment, management, environmental health, occupational health and safety management, asset management, building performance |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Quality Management, Risk Management, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here