Home energy monitors: Impact over the medium-term

Van Dam, S S; Bakker, C A and Van Hal, J D M (2010) Home energy monitors: Impact over the medium-term. Building Research & Information, 38(5), pp. 458-469. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Home Energy Management Systems (HEMS), e.g. energy monitors, are intermediary products that can visualize, manage, and/or monitor the energy use of other products or whole households. HEMS increasingly receive attention for their role in energy conservation in households. A literature review and a case study examine the mid-term effectiveness (more than 4 months) of HEMS. The case study presents the results of a 15-month pilot with a domestic energy monitor in the Netherlands. It explores the extent to which participants manage to sustain their initial electricity savings over time, with a special focus on the development of habitual energy-saving behaviour. The results show that the initial savings in electricity consumption of 7.8% after 4 months could not be sustained in the medium- to long-term. A second finding is that certain groups of people seem more receptive to energy-saving interventions than others. These participants quickly develop new habits and exhibit larger savings than other participants. Obviously, a 'one-size-fits-all' approach for home energy monitors cannot be justified. For HEMS to be effective, a deeper understanding is needed that embraces social science, contextual factors, usability, and interaction design research.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: captology; energy demand; energy management; energy monitor; home energy management system; housing; occupant behaviour; smart metering
Index terms: household, energy-saving, social science, electricity saving, effectiveness, energy management system, energy use, electricity consumption, interaction, housing, intermediary, occupant behaviour, habit, energy management, energy conservation, energy demand, case study, literature review, Netherlands, usability, savings
Subjects: demography, behavioral psychology, theoretical framing, performance management, Geography, sustainability and energy, energy systems, data analysis and analytics, economic analysis, data collection methods, construction type, business, user-centered design, health behaviours and lifestyles
Topics: Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here