Comfort standards and variations in exceedance for mixed-mode buildings

Borgeson, S and Brager, G (2011) Comfort standards and variations in exceedance for mixed-mode buildings. Building Research & Information, 39(2), pp. 118-133. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Mixed-mode buildings operate along a spectrum from sealed heating, ventilation and air-conditioning to 100% naturally ventilated, but little is known about their occupants' comfort expectations and experiences. Exceedance metrics, which quantify the percentage of time that a building's environment falls outside an expected thermal comfort zone, can help address the comfort trade-offs in building design and operation. Practitioners were polled on exceedance use in practice and comfort models and exceedance metrics were analysed: several comfort standards using EnergyPlus simulations of a mixed-mode building with radiant cooling in California's 16 climate zones. Results indicate that comfort model choice significantly influences predicted exceedance. Exceedance using PMV-PPD and the adaptive comfort models from ASHRAE Standard 55, EN 15251, and the Dutch NPR-CR 1752 frequently differed by 10 percentage points, often with 2-4 percentage points across the adaptive models. Yet, recommended exceedance limits often fall between 3% and 5% total. Exceedance predictions are also sensitive to uncertainties in predicted neutral comfort temperatures and variations in building envelope performance, solar heat gain, thermal mass, and control precision. Future work is needed to characterize comfort better in support of improved comfort modelling, exceedance targets, building design and building operation, and the development of related codes and standards.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adaptive comfort; building standards; comfort models; cooling; exceedance; mixed-mode; occupants; sensitivity; thermal comfort
Index terms: building design, thermal comfort, variation, modelling, solar heat gain, practitioner, adaptive model, ventilation, energyplus, adaptive comfort, building envelope, building operation, falls, comfort
Subjects: energy systems, environmental engineering, contractual condition, architectural elements, architectural design, health risk and incident analysis, air quality, occupational health and safety management, management, environmental science, practitioner, analytical methods, human factors
Topics: Contract Administration, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here