Feige, A; Wallbaum, H and Krank, S (2011) Harnessing stakeholdermotivation: Towards a Swiss sustainable building sector. Building Research & Information, 39(5), pp. 504-517. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The contribution of stakeholders to the development and implementation of a sustainable built environment has emerged as crucial to the delivery of meaningful change. The inclusion of all affected parties can facilitate the development of patterns, structures and buildings that are sustainable in the social, ecological and economic dimensions. The slow development of a more sustainable building sector often results from the absence of knowledge about possible benefits because of financial constraints or the presence of conflicting interests. Furthermore, in most cases, measures to foster a sustainable building sector do not include all of the relevant stakeholders or are only one-sided. Based on a literature review of stakeholders in the building sector, this paper describes the stakeholders involved in the development of sustainable buildings and the challenges in stakeholder motivation. The practical case of the Network for Sustainable Construction Switzerland demonstrates how to foster sustainable construction by including a wide range of stakeholders and the need to address stakeholders with diverse initiatives. This case study supports the hypothesis that stakeholder motivation cannot be created by a single initiative; rather, a variety of actions are required to deliver change successfully.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building sector; stakeholder management; stakeholder motivation; sustainability; sustainable construction |
| Index terms: | motivation, literature review, sustainable construction, case study, stakeholder management, dimension, implementation, presence, built environment, sustainable building, Switzerland |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, environmental science, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, participation process, health monitoring assessment and metrics, psychology, Geography, sustainable construction, infrastructure and transport systems |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Urban Studies, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Procurement, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here