Foruzanmehr, A and Vellinga, M (2011) Vernacular architecture: Questions of comfort and practicability. Building Research & Information, 39(3), pp. 274-285. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
A paradoxical situation exists where vernacular building traditions are in a state of decline and are being replaced by modern counterparts, but they are repeatedly cited in the academic literature as exemplary models of environmental practice. This paradox is examined through research on whether vernacular passive cooling systems in the hot and dry climates of present-day Iran are practicable for the provision of comfortable indoor temperatures. Investigating their technical thermal performance as well as user perceptions and behaviour, positive and negative attributes of the cooling systems are identified. If conclusions about the long-term viability of vernacular buildings are to be drawn, then social, cultural, economic and environmental attributes need to be taken into consideration. Despite rather widespread and persistent assumptions, vernacular building traditions are not necessarily able to survive and the choices made by local people regarding the continuation or abandonment of specific traditions are influenced by a variety of cultural and practical factors. This substantiates the necessity of an integrated and holistic approach that engages with these variables in order to acquire a better understanding of the conditions for the survival of vernacular traditions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptive comfort; building performance; expectations; Iran; local traditions; occupants; passive cooling; vernacular architecture |
| Index terms: | holistic approach, thermal performance, comfort, cooling system, paradox, vernacular architecture, survival, adaptive comfort, indoor temperature, abandonment, building performance |
| Subjects: | energy systems, environmental science, social theory and frameworks, mechanical systems, business, human factors, occupational health and safety management, heritage and conservation, completion, quality assurance |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Design Practice, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here