Barriers and drivers for sustainable building

Häkkinen, T and Belloni, K (2011) Barriers and drivers for sustainable building. Building Research & Information, 39(3), pp. 239-255. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

What are the actual barriers and drivers for sustainable building? A literature review, interviews and case studies are presented to address this question. Sustainable building is not hindered by a lack of technologies and assessment methods, but is instead beset with organizational and procedural difficulties entailed by the adoption of new methods. New technologies are resisted because they require process changes entailing risks and unforeseen costs. These hindrances can be reduced by learning what kind of decision-making phases, new tasks, actors, roles and ways of networking are needed. The barriers are outlined as steering mechanisms, economics, a lack of client understanding, process (procurement and tendering, timing, cooperation and networking), and underpinning knowledge (knowledge and common language, the availability of methods and tools, innovation). The most important actions to promote sustainable building are the development of the awareness of clients about the benefits of sustainable building, the development and adoption of methods for sustainable building requirement management, the mobilization of sustainable building tools, the development of designers' competence and team working, and the development of new concepts and services. The interviews and case studies were carried out in Finland, but the results may be applicable or interesting to other countries as well.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: barriers; construction industry; drivers; management; organizational change; professionalism; sustainable building; sustainable building process
Index terms: competence, sustainable building, decision-making, professionalism, cooperation, construction industry, interview, organizational change, new technology, case study, literature review, networking, Finland, process change, designer
Subjects: industry analysis, decision analysis, professional development, sustainable construction, personnel development, Geography, management, innovation and technology management, data analysis and analytics, psychology, communication, business, data collection methods, profession
Topics: Digital Applications, Human Resources, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here