Jensen, J S; Gottlieb, S C and Thuesen, C L (2011) Construction sector development: Frames and governance responses. Building Research & Information, 39(6), pp. 665-677. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The governance of construction sector development constitutes an important policy issue in many European countries due to the increasing impact that construction as well as the built environment have on gross domestic product and the environment. Previous studies have discussed how national construction industries have been framed as objects of development. However, less attention has been placed on exploring how an industry is recognized and framed as an object that can be subjected to organized development activities from the viewpoint of strategically motivated actors, and how such framing activities may be governed. Based on a case study of the sector development activities in the Danish construction industry, this paper argues that governance strategies should not necessarily be designed to ensure the development of a single industrial conceptualization. First, drawing on concepts from institutional theory it is suggested that strategic framing activities aiming to conceptualize an industry as a sectoral object of development are likely to generate multiple and incommensurable representations with different and conflicting strategic implications. Second, if faced with a development agenda composed of multiple incommensurable sector representations, then the most productive governance response may be to recognize and accept their conflicting strategic implications.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | business systems; construction industry; Denmark; governance; institutional theory; sector development |
| Index terms: | construction sector, construction industry, Denmark, built environment, strategy, drawing, framing, institutional theory, governance, gross domestic product, case study |
| Subjects: | Geography, management, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, business, data collection methods, economic analysis, conceptual models, technical documentation |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Urban Studies, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here