Plastic pipe pressures in siphonic roof drainage systems

Lucke, T and Arthur, S (2011) Plastic pipe pressures in siphonic roof drainage systems. Building Research & Information, 39(1), pp. 79-92. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Siphonic roof drainage is a highly efficient type of drainage system that is particularly suitable for large buildings and other structures over approximately 4 m in height. Although siphonic roof drainage systems are enjoying ever-increasing popularity with architects, there is still some uncertainty regarding the minimum pipe pressure class required for siphonic pipework, especially in tall buildings. This is particularly the case in warmer countries since higher temperatures can drastically decrease the strength of the pipework material used in siphonic systems - typically unplasticized polyvinylchloride (PVC-U) and high-density polyethylene (HDPE). However, there is very limited information available on how plastic pipes behave under the sub-atmospheric pressures that occur under operating conditions in siphonic systems. This paper describes experiments conducted to investigate sub-atmospheric pressures in siphonic systems and how they may be controlled by injecting air into vertical downpipes. Recommendations for minimum pipework pressure classes are provided together with methods for limiting the minimum pressures without significantly decreasing the system capacity. This paper will help engineers design siphonic systems with more confidence so that such systems will continue to perform adequately over their intended design life.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: critical buckling pressure; negative pressure; siphonic roof drainage
Index terms: architect, tall building, drainage, plastic, density, experiment, engineer, siphonic roof drainage
Subjects: materials science, data collection methods, environmental engineering, construction type, infrastructure and transport systems, profession, analytical methods
Topics: Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Urban Studies, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here