Lützkendorf, T and Lorenz, D (2011) Capturing sustainability-related information for property valuation. Building Research & Information, 39(3), pp. 256-273. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Within current property markets, sustainability characteristics enhance and complement the traditional drivers of a property's economic value. However, sustainability-related information needs to be considered within the property valuation process to account for how this impacts upon a building's valuation. This requires adjusting and further developing valuation procedures. Most sustainability assessment systems coexist in isolation beside the traditional instruments and methods of the property industry, e.g. property valuation and risk analyses. This paper shows that the sustainability assessment of buildings can be adapted to serve as a key source of information for several actors in property markets (particularly valuation professionals). The information requirements of valuation professionals are explored in relation to sustainability. A structure for information is proposed that enables valuation professionals to reach an improved and more systematic description of buildings for valuation purposes combining both traditional as well as sustainability-related aspects. Several actors (sustainability assessors, designers, planners and facility managers) have a role (1) in providing an improved description of buildings along their life cycle and (2) in creating a more robust informational basis for property valuations. This would provide a competitive advantage for these actors (or for some 'early adopters' among them) by responding to the sustainability-related information requirements of valuation professional and their financial colleagues within the property industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information; buildings; property valuation; real estate appraisal; sustainability assessment |
| Index terms: | competitive advantage, sustainability assessment, planner, manager, property market, life cycle, appraisal, real estate, risk analysis, designer |
| Subjects: | value management, real estate economics, market analysis, sustainability assessment, environmental hazards, practitioner, factor and component analysis, profession |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Urban Studies, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here