Nishida, Y and Hua, Y (2011) Motivating stakeholders to deliver change: Tokyo's cap-and-trade program. Building Research & Information, 39(5), pp. 518-533. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
In April 2010 the Tokyo Metropolitan Government launched the Tokyo Cap-and-Trade Program to reduce energy consumption-related CO2 emissions at the city level. This is the world's first cap-and-trade programme to cover buildings in the commercial, industrial and public sectors. Its main aim is to reduce CO2 emissions from energy consumption in existing buildings in urban areas; therefore, it is called an 'urban cap-and-trade programme'. The appropriateness and effectiveness of this demand-side mechanism are examined, as well as the key policy and strategy components for introducing this new mechanism. Crucial factors for the successful introduction of this programme include the implementation of a mandatory reporting programme prior to the cap-and-trade programme and a consultation process involving open discussions among stakeholders for creating a consensus. Actual outcomes of the programme will take several years to assess; however, given the significant impact of growing carbon emissions from existing urban buildings, an urban cap-and-trade mechanism can be a worthwhile action at the level of local governance. Based on these lessons, other cities can consider this urban cap-and-trade scheme as a viable policy instrument.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | buildings; cap-and-trade; cities; climate change; CO2 emissions; energy demand; governance; policy formation; stakeholder motivation |
| Index terms: | public sector, program, policy instrument, climate change, urban area, strategy, motivation, CO2 emissions, governance, energy consumption, implementation, effectiveness, carbon emission, policy formation, Tokyo, programme, energy demand |
| Subjects: | project controls, Geography, psychology, administrative law, business, policy studies, software systems, energy systems, urban form and morphology, air quality, management, performance management, climate science, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Quality Management, Geographical Context, Time Control, Business Strategy, Procurement, Legal Issues, Human Resources, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here