Historical energy analysis of the Norwegian dwelling stock

Sandberg, N H; Bergsdal, H and Brattebø, H (2011) Historical energy analysis of the Norwegian dwelling stock. Building Research & Information, 39(1), pp. 1-15. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The building sector is a big consumer of energy and is responsible for a considerable share of the greenhouse gas emissions within most developed countries. Based on the development in underlying drivers and using system analysis methods, the historical development in energy flows in the Norwegian residential building stock, the associated costs and greenhouse gas emissions are estimated. The results show that although a 39% decrease occurred in energy consumption per square metre in the use phase, the total energy consumption increased due to increased stock size. Further, the total energy consumption was substantially dominated by the use phase. The energy-related costs increase even more than energy consumption due to increased energy prices, but the greenhouse gas emissions decrease due to changes in the energy mix. The per-capita results follow the same trends as the aggregated results, whereas there have been larger improvements in the system on a per-square-metre basis. Based on underlying drivers, the model ensures inclusion of development trends that are not easily explained by the direct factors energy efficiency, energy mix and energy prices.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building stock; carbon footprint; cost analysis; dwelling stock; dynamic material flow analysis; economic footprint; energy consumption; energy efficiency; greenhouse gas emissions
Index terms: energy mix, residential building, energy efficiency, carbon footprint, cost analysis, building stock, historical development, material flow analysis, energy analysis, developed country, greenhouse gas emission, energy consumption
Subjects: environmental health, engineering analysis, asset management, development economics, material science and engineering, financial and cost management, architectural and construction history, energy systems, sustainability and energy, environmental impact, construction type
Topics: Construction Technology, Sustainability, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, International Construction, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here