Thomsen, A and Van Der Flier, K (2011) Understanding obsolescence: A conceptual model for buildings. Building Research & Information, 39(4), pp. 352-362. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
What is obsolescence? Numerous older buildings have been demolished due to being labelled as obsolete. There is a general understanding that buildings, similar to machinery and durable consumer goods, should be demolished and replaced when they become obsolete. The truth of this assertion is examined and found to be problematic, as obsolescence is not clearly understood in conceptual or practical terms. Obsolescence presents a serious threat to built property as it rarely accounts for the immobile, long-lasting and (financial and natural resource) capital-intensive characteristics of property, nor for its societal and cultural significance. Minimizing obsolescence and extending longevity are therefore indispensable for maintaining the physical, economic and societal investments. The characteristics and symptoms of obsolescence are explored specifically to address how buildings can be diagnosed and when and to what extent is demolition an unavoidable consequence. A theoretical/conceptual model is developed which allows for different kinds of obsolescence to be characterized and distinguished. The model distinguishes between physical and behavioural factors and between endogenous and exogenous factors. It also accounts for the often inverse relation between the increase of complexity of types of obsolescence and the decrease of the owner's possibilities to manage it. Through the provision of an interrelational approach, the model explains why obsolescence occurs and it can be used as a basis for structuring an evidence base on obsolescence.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building management; building pathology; building stock; decision-making; demolition; life cycle extension; obsolescence |
| Index terms: | cultural significance, natural resource, building stock, life cycle, owner, building management, complexity, building pathology, evidence, obsolescence, decision-making |
| Subjects: | evaluation and assessment methods, value management, environmental resource management, professional practice, management, cross-cultural studies, asset management, decision analysis, sociology, systems engineering |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Design Practice, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here