The practice of sustainable facilities management: Design sentiments and the knowledge chasm

Elmualim, A; Czwakiel, A; Valle, R; Ludlow, G and Shah, S (2009) The practice of sustainable facilities management: Design sentiments and the knowledge chasm. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 5(1-2), pp. 91-102. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

The construction industry with its nature of project delivery is very fragmented in terms of the various processes that encompass design, construction, facilities and assets management. Facilities managers are in the forefront of delivering sustainable assets management and hence further the venture for mitigation and adaptation to climate change. A questionnaire survey was conducted to establish perceptions, level of commitment and knowledge chasm in practising sustainable facilities management (FM). This has significant implications for sustainable design management, especially in a fragmented industry. The majority of questionnaire respondents indicated the importance of sustainability for their organization. Many of them stated that they reported on sustainability as part of their organization annual reporting with energy efficiency, recycling and waste reduction as the main concern for them. The overwhelming barrier for implementing sound, sustainable FM is the lack of consensual understanding and focus of individuals and organizations about sustainability. There is a knowledge chasm regarding practical information on delivering sustainable FM. Sustainability information asymmetry in design, construction and FM processes render any sustainable design as a sentiment and mere design aspiration. Skills and training provision, traditionally offered separately to designers and facilities managers, needs to be re-evaluated. Sustainability education and training should be developed to provide effective structures and processes to apply sustainability throughout the construction and FM industries coherently and as common practice.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: climate change; energy management; facilities management; recycling; sustainability
Index terms: energy efficiency, sustainability education, information asymmetry, sustainable design, recycling, commitment, designer, survey, adaptation, mitigation, questionnaire, facilities manager, construction industry, waste reduction, facilities management, project delivery, energy management, climate change
Subjects: industry analysis, educational innovation, financial risk, design process, management, sustainability assessment, project delivery, psychology, sustainability and energy, waste management, climate science, practitioner, data collection methods, profession, transaction economics, user focus
Topics: Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Procurement, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Education
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here