Wassenberg, F (2011) Demolition in the Bijlmermeer: Lessons from transforming a large housing estate. Building Research & Information, 39(4), pp. 363-379. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The most idealistic modern post-war housing area in the Netherlands is the Bijlmermeer high-rise district in Amsterdam's suburbs. However, the development quickly became a failure, leading to the eventual demolition of half of its 13000 dwellings, only a generation after completion, becoming one of Europe's largest urban renewal areas. The underlying reasons for this drastic demolition process are explored through a longitudinal view of how and why demolition occurs. The urban renewal process occurred over 20 plus years and changed dramatically in policy and strategy over this period: from initial denial, to the provision of new or improved services, amenities and infrastructure, to new management, finance and demographic (inhabitant) selection processes, to demolition and rebuilding. The process reflects the varied nature of difficult problems, the changing dynamics in building consensus between stakeholders and the emerging recognition that solutions must entail social, physical and financial capital. The Bijlmermeer transformation is significant for the regeneration of other housing estates as clear lessons are evident about the interplay between the physical form, management and demographics and they illustrate why demolition is a solution of the last resort.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | demolition; high-rise housing; housing policy; housing stock; large housing estates; urban renewal policy |
| Index terms: | dynamics, demographics, strategy, housing, large housing, becoming, rebuilding, housing estate, transformation, Amsterdam, Netherlands, housing stock, war, Europe, financial capital, urban renewal, housing policy |
| Subjects: | management, industry analysis, post-disaster and reconstruction, systems engineering, asset management, conflict and crisis studies, economic development, demography, building construction, Geography, construction type, business, public policy, physical geography and landforms, philosophical process |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Legal Issues, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Governance, Urban Studies, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here