Building energy models and assessment systems at the district and city scales: A review

Bourdic, L and Salat, S (2012) Building energy models and assessment systems at the district and city scales: A review. Building Research & Information, 40(4), pp. 518-526. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Understanding how and why cities and the urban fabric contribute to energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is a crucial issue regarding climate change and resource scarcity. A critical review is presented of the calculation tools, models, and assessment systems that deal with energy consumption and GHG emissions from buildings at the district and city scales. The review encompasses international assessment systems and technical models developed in Japan, North America and Europe. The relationships and connections between policy and research within these systems are examined. Chronic systemic failures are highlighted that should be addressed rapidly in the research agenda. The negative impacts are considered in terms of the operational potential due to the use of rough aggregation methods. The analysis emphasizes the need for more systemic, multi-scale and transverse approaches to deal with the intrinsic complexity of the urban fabric. Four intervention points for urban efficiency are proposed: urban morphology, buildings' efficiency, systems' efficiency and individual behaviours. Harnessing all of these would improve the potential of models and assessment systems. Combining these urban efficiencies would have a multiplier effect in terms of actual outcomes in reducing energy consumption.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: assessment system; buildings; city scale; district scale; energy model; research agenda
Index terms: complexity, greenhouse gas, climate change, building energy model, urban fabric, urban morphology, energy consumption, Japan, energy model, Europe, research agenda, efficiency
Subjects: energy systems, climate science, systems engineering, research management, Geography, performance management, urban form and morphology, physical geography and landforms
Topics: Urban Studies, Quality Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here