Cole, R J (2012) Transitioning from green to regenerative design. Building Research & Information, 40(1), pp. 39-53. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Green building strategies, performance goals, and associated assessment methods currently emphasize the ways and extent that buildings should mitigate global and local resource depletion and environmental degradation. By contrast, the emerging notion of regenerative design and development emphasizes a co-evolutionary, partnered relationship between humans and the natural environment, rather than a managerial one that builds, rather than diminishes, social and natural capitals. Three ideas are addressed. First, understanding the relationship between green, sustainable, and regenerative design and associated assessment frameworks, giving emphasis to how they represent and engage natural systems and processes. Second, characterizing the type of discussions that these three approaches generate amongst the design team and between the design team and its clients in terms of strengthening an understanding of natural systems. Finally, the inherent potential of green, sustainability and regenerative design approaches to create the necessary and timely changes in performance improvements. One of the most significant differences - and central to this discussion - lies in the ways that uncertainty of the long-term outcomes associated with different design decisions are acknowledged and accommodated in design.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | assessment; buildings; green design; reductive; regenerative design; sustainability; systems thinking |
| Index terms: | regenerative design, depletion, strengthening, environmental degradation, design decision, strategy, performance improvement, green building, design team, systems thinking |
| Subjects: | design practice, management, environmental impact, professional practice, structural engineering, environmental resource management, analytical methods, performance measurement, sustainability and energy |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Quality Management, Design Practice, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here