A regenerative design framework: Setting new aspirations and initiating new discussions

Cole, R J; Busby, P; Guenther, R; Briney, L; Blaviesciunaite, A and Alencar, T (2012) A regenerative design framework: Setting new aspirations and initiating new discussions. Building Research & Information, 40(1), pp. 95-111. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Given the success of building environmental assessment methods in moving green performance criteria into mainstream practice, it is anticipated that similar support tools will be necessary to make regenerative design and development approaches more widespread. This paper describes the rationale, design and potential application of a framework developed to support regenerative design and development in practice and, in particular, the transition from current green practices and discussions to those shaped by regenerative principles. Rather than present sets of specific design strategies and directives that could inhibit creative solutions, the framework is populated with provocative questions. These are considered the most effective basis for initiating a different and expanded dialogue between the design team members and with the client and users and to engage a broader range of possibilities by moving beyond the immediate building and site boundaries. Moreover, while the framework has a consistent structure, the questions change and can be adapted to different situations - from community engagement, design charrettes and team meetings to detailed design explorations.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildings; design framework; ecosphere; place; regenerative design; resource flows; sustainable design
Index terms: boundaries, exploration, charrette, community engagement, building environmental assessment, design team, performance criteria, resource flow, regenerative design, sustainable design, design strategy, design framework
Subjects: community and social dimensions, design methods, resource management, professional practice, property law, environmental resource management, sustainability and energy, design process, sustainability assessment, design practice, performance measurement
Topics: Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Site Management, Quality Management, Legal Issues, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here