D'Amato, M and Kauko, T (2012) Sustainability and risk premium estimation in property valuation and assessment of worth. Building Research & Information, 40(2), pp. 174-185. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
From a risk analysis perspective, property is typically treated as just another asset class. Some academics propose only a financial - not a physical or a functional - definition of valuation modelling. An alternative method is proposed here to assess the risk premium for both property valuation and assessment of worth which is directly based on the property market, rather than the traditional financial model of risk premium determination or reliance on the individual expertise of a property valuer. The proposed method is based on the empirical relationship between discount cash flow (DCF) inputs and output, and can be based on the prices of comparable properties. In the traditional approach, the fact that financial modelling approximates real property to a financial asset class arguably emphasizes the illiquid nature of real property. As a consequence, all the attributes including sustainability indicators are normally not taken into account by property valuers and consultants. The market increasingly requires green buildings and development; through the use of the proposed model this need can be included in the data for risk premium estimation, in the valuation process, and, generally speaking, in the body of knowledge informing the property market.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | buildings; discount cash flow; property valuation; risk premium; sustainability; value |
| Index terms: | risk premium, body of knowledge, green building, risk analysis, sustainability indicator, valuer, estimation, property market, cash flow, modelling |
| Subjects: | knowledge management, sustainability assessment, financial management, profession, design practice, environmental hazards, economic analysis, analytical methods, real estate economics, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here