Du Plessis, C (2012) Towards a regenerative paradigm for the built environment. Building Research & Information, 40(1), pp. 7-22. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The concept of regenerative design and development is situated within the broader theoretical context of sustainability. The emerging regenerative paradigm is contrasted with the two current sustainability paradigms - internationally negotiated idealistic public policy and private sector Ecological Modernization - that seek to maintain the status quo. Each of these sustainability paradigms is explained though a brief historical narrative to illustrate their response to broader social pressures, the main critiques of each and some commonalities. It is argued that the dominant sustainability paradigms are reaching the limitations of their usefulness due to their conceptual foundation in an inappropriate mechanistic worldview and their tacit support of a modernization project that prevents effective engagement with a complex, dynamic and living world. The regenerative paradigm provides an alternative that is explicitly designed to engage with a living world through its emphasis on a co-creative partnership with nature based on strategies of adaptation, resilience and regeneration. It provides a foundation for a sustainability paradigm that is relevant to an ecological worldview.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; ecologism; regenerative design; resilience; sustainable building; sustainable design; urban sustainability |
| Index terms: | regenerative design, sustainable design, strategy, private sector, partnership, critique, adaptation, paradigm, sustainable building, narrative, built environment, public policy, ecological modernization |
| Subjects: | partnership management, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, management, education and knowledge transfer, health safety and environment, qualitative and interpretive research, sustainable construction, design process, sustainability and energy, public policy, evaluation and assessment methods, user focus |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Urban Studies, Sustainability, Governance, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here