Fawcett, W; Hughes, M; Krieg, H; Albrecht, S and Vennström, A (2012) Flexible strategies for long-term sustainability under uncertainty. Building Research & Information, 40(5), pp. 545-557. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Assessing the economic and environmental life cycle impacts of long-lasting construction projects presents numerous methodological challenges. Three advances over established methods are presented for the life cycle evaluation of construction projects. First, future uncertainty during the project life or study period is explicitly accounted for. This involves moving from a deterministic approach requiring precise data to a probabilistic approach where uncertain variables are defined by ranges. The outcome of life cycle evaluation is then given by probability distributions, generated by Monte Carlo simulation. Second, flexible strategies are considered that allow for adaptation to changing conditions during the project life. Flexible strategies (also modelled by Monte Carlo simulation) incorporate specified life cycle options which are exercised if it is advantageous to do so, otherwise they remain unexercised. Third, cost-based life cycle costing (LCC) and environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) are linked in a single LCC+A evaluation tool. There are still differences between cost and environmental evaluation, but the use of a shared framework enables the two aspects to be compared systematically. The two-dimensional ecoportfolio diagram presents one way of analysing results. The innovations are demonstrated in a case study that assesses both economic and environmental impacts while accounting for future uncertainties.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptation; building economics; design strategies; flexibility; life cycle assessment; life cycle cost; real options; uncertainty |
| Index terms: | design strategy, case study, strategy, Monte Carlo simulation, life cycle assessment, life cycle, life cycle cost, adaptation, probability distribution, construction project, environmental impact, building economics, evaluation tool, costing, accounting, real option, option |
| Subjects: | research methods, accounting and finance, management, production management, decision analysis, cost management, statistical analysis, user focus, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, value management, design methods, environmental impact, modelling and simulation, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Site Management, Design Practice, Sustainability, Risk Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here