Gansmo, H J (2012) Municipal planning of a sustainable neighbourhood: Action research and stakeholder dialogue. Building Research & Information, 40(4), pp. 493-503. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
How can researchers and planners best facilitate the transition to low-carbon societies? In particular, can they initiate better dialogue in order to foster stakeholder engagement in planning, building and living in low-carbon settlements? These challenges inform a municipal planning process for a new neighbourhood in Trondheim, Norway: Brset, as well as for an interdisciplinary research project exploring the role of action research in supporting the transition to low-carbon societies. The processes are described for identifying the central actors and applying the dialogue strategies in the early planning project phase. Researchers and planners collaborated to contribute to new knowledge production and practice to support the transition to low-carbon societies. The utility of the co-produced results is their potential contribution to both standards of rigour as well as the timely dissemination of research and knowledge sharing within and across research communities and to different stakeholders involved in the project. This case study provides interesting lessons about why and how other projects can consider similar action research processes as a viable approach for sustaining the transition to low-carbon economies, particularly in the early planning phase.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | action research; community engagement; energy; integrated design; interdisciplinarity; low-carbon society; neighbourhood design; planning; sustainable settlements |
| Index terms: | planner, stakeholder engagement, dissemination, neighbourhood design, municipal planning, knowledge sharing, Norway, interdisciplinary research, strategy, community engagement, action research, case study, low-carbon society |
| Subjects: | urban planning, knowledge management, data collection methods, profession, community and social dimensions, management, sustainability assessment, research methods, Geography, urban design, knowledge translation |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Governance, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here