Gupta, R and Gregg, M (2012) Appraisal of UK funding frameworks for energy research in housing. Building Research & Information, 40(4), pp. 446-460. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The current UK research capacity and funding programmes in the field of energy use and energy demand reduction in existing housing are appraised. A satellite-hub model concept is proposed as an appropriate way forward. To set the scene, the complex nature and difficulty of the problem of achieving real energy reductions in housing is highlighted and research opportunities for current and forthcoming housing and energy policy measures are investigated. A range of recent and on-going research funding programmes managed by UK Research Councils, government departments and industry are appraised in the context of relevant policy measures and criteria that the authors consider to be essential for rapid and high-quality research in domestic energy reduction. Finally, the implementation of the concept of a satellite-hub model is explored through the structure and operation of a domestic energy use and retrofit research satellite-hub on a regional and national level. This provides an insight into a potential evolutionary change in the research of energy use and demand reduction in existing housing.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building; climate change; energy; energy policy; housing; research policy; retrofitting |
| Index terms: | energy demand, energy policy, programme, energy reduction, research policy, research funding, policy measure, funding, climate change, retrofitting, housing, appraisal, satellite, implementation, energy use |
| Subjects: | renovation and retrofit, factor and component analysis, research management, networking, project controls, policy studies, construction type, climate science, economic and policy analysis, public policy, economic analysis, contractual arrangements, energy systems |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Procurement, Governance, Sustainability, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here