Healy, D P (2012) Influence of the carbon intensity of electricity on carbon savings from CHP. Building Research & Information, 40(3), pp. 317-326. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The carbon intensity of electricity is a key input to calculations of carbon emissions from buildings, and can be decisive in the selection of low- and zero-carbon technologies. The origin of the value for the carbon intensity of electricity is not well understood and its derivation is investigated. The carbon savings from gas-fired combined heat and power (CHP) vary greatly depending on the carbon intensity of electricity. The current debate about the effectiveness of CHP centres on detailed considerations about which values for the carbon intensity of electricity should be used. The expected future decarbonization of the electricity supply grid would considerably reduce carbon intensities, thus the longer-term trends in carbon intensity and their effect on the carbon savings from CHP are of greater importance. A new expression has been developed to describe the carbon savings from CHP and trigeneration as a function of varying carbon intensity of electricity. While CHP can offer limited carbon savings in the short-term, the future decarbonization of the electricity grid means that CHP will soon be among the most carbon-intensive technologies, and the use of trigeneration will cease to provide carbon savings even sooner.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building regulation; carbon emissions; carbon intensity of electricity; combined heat and power; low-and zero-carbon technologies; low-carbon buildings; trigeneration |
| Index terms: | savings, low-carbon building, building regulation, carbon emission, effectiveness |
| Subjects: | climate science, economic analysis, performance management, design practice, regulatory law |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Business Strategy, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 1 C |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here