Design integration of facilities management: A challenge of knowledge transfer

Jensen, P A (2009) Design integration of facilities management: A challenge of knowledge transfer. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 5(3), pp. 124-135. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

One of the problems in the building industry is a limited degree of learning from experiences of use and operation of existing buildings. Development of professional facilities management (FM) can be seen as the missing link to bridge the gap between building operation and building design. The paper identifies the aspects of FM that should be considered during the different stages of design. A typology of knowledge transfer from building operation to building design is presented based on a combination of knowledge push from building operation and knowledge pull from building design. Strategies, methods and barriers for the transfer and integration of operational knowledge into the design process are discussed. Multiple strategies are needed to improve the integration of FM in design. Building clients must take on a leading role in defining and setting up requirements and procedures. Involvement of professional facilities managers in the design process is an obvious strategy, but increased competences are needed among building clients, designers and the operational staff. More codification of operational knowledge is also needed, for instance in IT systems. The paper is based on literature studies and case studies from the Nordic countries in Europe, including research reflections on experiences from a main case study, where the author, before becoming a university researcher, was engaged in the client organization as deputy project director with responsibility for the integration of considerations for facilities management.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building design; design management; experiences; facilities management; integration
Index terms: building operation, facilities management, building industry, integration, design management, competence, reflection, knowledge transfer, facilities manager, strategy, client organization, designer, building design, case study, design process, Europe, becoming
Subjects: architectural design, practitioner, design methods, research dissemination and communication, data collection methods, profession, client relations, philosophical process, industry analysis, organizational analysis, professional development, design process, personnel development, physical geography and landforms, management
Topics: Organizational Design, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here