Koch, A; Girard, S and McKoen, K (2012) Towards a neighbourhood scale for low- or zero-carbon building projects. Building Research & Information, 40(4), pp. 527-537. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The progression towards low- or zero-carbon buildings (as evidenced in the defined goals of the UK's Code for Sustainable Homes) introduces a paradigm shift for the energy supply infrastructure. It will no longer be sufficient to understand buildings as the demand side of an energy system - the supply side will also need consideration. Currently, electricity mainly accounts for the positive side of zero-energy building energy balances. In future, energy management strategies could also include local heat trading schemes to capitalize on local energy balancing. The topic of load matching between a building's electrical and thermal needs and its distributed generation is examined. Some of the most promising solutions to manage energy supply intermittency are only available on a larger scale than individual buildings. The intermediate scale of the urban neighbourhood has the potential to address energy supply and demand structures and create high-performance buildings and settlements. The commitment to the introduction of nearly zero-carbon buildings thus introduces a need to evaluate alternative system boundaries for describing the energy balance of buildings and their impact on local energy networks at a suitable scale. The implications for the research agenda are discussed.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | energy balance; energy conservation; exergy; low-carbon society; research agenda; urban energy systems; zero-carbon buildings |
| Index terms: | energy conservation, commitment, supply and demand, research agenda, boundaries, distributed generation, zero-energy building, energy management, paradigm, low-carbon society, energy system, strategy |
| Subjects: | sustainability assessment, management, market analysis, property law, sustainability and energy, energy systems, psychology, research management, education and knowledge transfer |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Design Practice, Research Practice, Sustainability, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here