Li, B and Yao, R (2012) Building energy efficiency for sustainable development in China: Challenges and opportunities. Building Research & Information, 40(4), pp. 417-431. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Rapid urbanization in China has resulted in great demands for energy, resources and pressure on the environment. The progress in China's development is considered in the context of energy efficiency in the built environment, including policy, technology and implementation. The key research challenges and opportunities are identified for delivering a low-carbon built environment. The barriers include the existing traditional sequential design process, the lack of integrated approaches and insufficient socio-technical knowledge. A proposed conceptual systemic model of an integrated approach identifies research opportunities. The organization of research activities should be initiated, operated and managed in a collaborative way among policy-makers, professionals, researchers and stakeholders. More emphasis is needed on integrating social, economic and environmental impacts in the short, medium and long terms. An ideal opportunity exists for China to develop its own expertise, not merely in a technical sense but in terms of vision and intellectual leadership in order to flourish in global collaborations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; carbon reduction; China; energy efficiency; integrated design; low-carbon society; research agenda; sustainable design; urbanization |
| Index terms: | collaboration, socio-technical, design process, urbanization, carbon reduction, environmental impact, integrated approach, built environment, energy efficiency, implementation, research agenda, sustainable design, China, low-carbon society, sustainable development |
| Subjects: | sustainability and energy, climate science, research management, contractual arrangements, research methods, design methods, infrastructure and transport systems, Geography, urban planning, environmental impact, sustainability assessment, management, design process, health safety and environment |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Sustainability, Urban Studies, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Governance, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here