Mang, P and Reed, B (2012) Designing from place: A regenerative framework and methodology. Building Research & Information, 40(1), pp. 23-38. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The radical changes required for Earth to remain fit for human habitation require a change in worldviews from mechanistic to ecological. A key question is: how can those working on the built environment - a field with major impact on global resources and systems - best support a smooth and timely transition? It is proposed that design practitioners can facilitate that response in the built environment through the development, application and evolution of comprehensive new methodologies, explicitly shaped by a regenerative sustainability paradigm. It is further proposed that successfully evolving a regenerative practice requires going beyond just adopting new techniques to taking on a new role for humans and designers, and a new mind, and learning how to work developmentally. As an example of how a consciously held worldview shapes a practice, an actual regenerative methodology, developed and evolved over 16 years of practice, is explored in detail. A framework, adapted from accepted scientific methodology protocols, is used to structure this exploration, differentiating the different elements and levels, showing how they work as an integrated system and revealing the underlying premises and assumptions behind the choice of aims, strategies, methods and progress indicators.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | living systems; permaculture; place; regenerative development and design; story |
| Index terms: | methodology, exploration, paradigm, evolution, built environment, practitioner, integrated system, strategy, designer |
| Subjects: | environmental resource management, environmental science, profession, design methods, practitioner, infrastructure and transport systems, management, education and knowledge transfer, research methods |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Urban Studies, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here