Plaut, J M; Dunbar, B; Wackerman, A and Hodgin, S (2012) Regenerative design: The lenses framework for buildings and communities. Building Research & Information, 40(1), pp. 112-122. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Sustainability advocates see an immediate, pressing need to move beyond incremental improvements toward profound transformations on pressing economic, social and environmental issues. A framework called LENSES (Living Environments in Natural, Social, and Economic Systems) is presented that can address the type and scale of change necessary. This framework outlines a process to help communities and project teams create places where natural, social and economic systems can mutually thrive and prosper. LENSES is both a process and a metrics tool designed to help teams establish goals and to explore effectively relationships and interconnections in order to create restorative and regenerative places. The strength of LENSES lies in its ability to help groups consider concepts and elements often missing in other frameworks and tools such as inclusivity, financial sourcing, cultural resources, regional context, education, shared authority and governance, and on-going prosperity. LENSES provides a clear path to facilitate movement toward regenerative, place-based solutions in the built environment and beyond.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | buildings; design framework; design tools; lenses; living environments; place; regenerative design; resource flows; sustainable design |
| Index terms: | resource flow, design framework, environmental issue, sustainable design, regenerative design, project team, built environment, movement, transformation, governance |
| Subjects: | sustainability and energy, project delivery, business, infrastructure and transport systems, environmental issues, design practice, health behaviours and lifestyles, resource management, design process |
| Topics: | Site Management, Urban Studies, Governance, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Sustainability, Design Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here