Energy and environmental appraisal of domestic laundering appliances

Porteous, C D A; Sharpe, T R; Menon, R A; Shearer, D; Musa, H; Baker, P H; Sanders, C H; Strachan, P A; Kelly, N J and Markopoulos, A (2012) Energy and environmental appraisal of domestic laundering appliances. Building Research & Information, 40(6), pp. 679-699. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

At a time when UK and Scottish governments are aiming for zero-carbon housing, there are two key issues for domestic laundering: passive indoor drying, affecting heating use and the indoor environment (addressed elsewhere); and energy and environmental impacts of appliances. Relevant findings are reported on the 2008-2011 study Environmental Assessment of Domestic Laundering, drawing on monitored data from 22 case studies out of 100 dwellings surveyed in Glasgow. Differing consumer traits and habits, combined with variable technical performance, provide quantitative and qualitative evidence of a wide estimated annual consumption range. Actual usage and energy consumption averaged less than UK predictions; and values did not necessarily correspond with manufacturers' energy ratings. In a wider discussion, case study median and mean extrapolations of electricity consumed by laundering (105 and 174 kWh/person-year) prove significant relative to the proportion of what could be available to a dwelling achieving the German Passivhaus standard. The potential for heat recovery from grey water is posited along with other options for mitigating power consumed by appliances. Renewable technology to offset consumption in shared facilities is discussed as a means of easing the performance of individual homes. The foregoing aspects are among key conclusions directed at housing occupiers, providers, national and local governments, and industry.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: appliances; consumer habits; domestic laundering; energy consumption; housing; indoor air quality; inhabitant behaviour; plug loads
Index terms: Passivhaus, renewable technology, energy consumption, consumer habit, drawing, manufacturer, option, indoor air quality, environmental assessment, appraisal, indoor environment, environmental impact, recovery, habit, local government, inhabitant behaviour, consumption, housing, evidence, case study
Subjects: decision analysis, health behaviours and lifestyles, administrative law, sociology, consumer economics, environmental health, evaluation and assessment methods, environmental impact, environmental science, energy efficiency, practitioner, construction type, energy systems, operations management, data collection methods, sustainable design, factor and component analysis, technical documentation
Topics: Legal Issues, Design Practice, Construction Technology, Project Management, Sustainability, Risk Management, Urban Studies, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here