Legislating building energy performance: Putting EU policy into practice

Raslan, R and Davies, M (2012) Legislating building energy performance: Putting EU policy into practice. Building Research & Information, 40(3), pp. 305-316. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The UK governmental strategy for fulfilling Article 3 of the Directive on Energy Performance of Buildings was implemented through the introduction of the Building and Approved Inspectors (Amendment) Regulations 2006 (England and Wales). These regulations defined the 'National Calculation Methodology' as the unified route for demonstrating compliance with energy performance criteria and required the use of accredited building energy performance prediction tools to implement associated calculations. A mixed-method study was used to synthesize a comprehensive assessment of the viability of adopting this approach for the new non-domestic sector. Key parameters of success measuring the adaptive capability of the UK construction industry, applicability of the methodology and suitability of accredited tools were developed as the framework for evaluation. The main findings outline shortcomings in the adaptation strategy adopted by industry, inconsistent implementation/enforcement approaches and fundamental tool limitations. The research concludes that although a number of positive aspects can be associated with the use of this approach for compliance demonstration, considerable efforts are required to extend its usefulness as a credible legislative support tool. Key recommendations are provided in the fields of research and development, policy formulation, and future industry practice.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building performance; building regulations; compliance assessment; energy prediction; european policy; performance-based regulations
Index terms: Wales, implementation, construction industry, energy performance, enforcement, suitability, regulation, methodology, research and development, adaptation, building performance, strategy, performance-based regulation, compliance, building regulation, England
Subjects: quality assurance, political science, design criteria, industry analysis, regulatory law, research management, Geography, health safety and environment, research methods, management, energy systems, contractual arrangements, user focus
Topics: Quality Management, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Governance, Sustainability, Procurement, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here