Roggema, R and Van Den Dobbelsteen, A (2012) Swarm planning for climate change: An alternative pathway for resilience. Building Research & Information, 40(5), pp. 606-624. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Swarm planning is a theory and practical approach to deal with uncertain futures. By anticipating scenarios such as a post-carbon world and a pre-adaptive landscape, it offers an alternative pathway to prepare for medium-term incremental and step changes. The focus is on the regional scale with a planning process to move from an unstable state (i.e. due to external impacts of climate change) towards a state of higher adaptive capacity. It increases the flexibility of spatial systems in two ways: assisting change in spatial land use over time; and catalysing the emergence of autonomous and more resilient developments. Swarm planning theory is used in two pilot designs and compared with regular planning processes. The results are presented in the form of new landscapes: the Zero-Fossil Region, where the design provides a spatial framework for a complete renewable energy supply, and the Net Carbon Capture Landscape, in which adaptation and mitigation strategies are designed to become carbon positive. The comparison illuminates the potential advantage of swarm planning to tackle climate change threats.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptation; adaptive capacity; built environment; resilience; spatial design; swarm planning; uncertainty |
| Index terms: | renewable energy, climate change, step-change, strategy, mitigation, adaptive capacity, emergence, land use, adaptation, planning process, built environment |
| Subjects: | financial risk, climate science, systems engineering, management, innovation studies, real estate economics, urban design, user focus, energy systems, infrastructure and transport systems, project controls |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Time Control, Urban Studies, Cost Management, Design Practice, Sustainability, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here