Sage, D; Dainty, A and Brookes, N (2012) A strategy-as-practice exploration of lean construction strategizing. Building Research & Information, 40(2), pp. 221-230. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
A growing body of work emerging from the management and organizational studies literature is the Strategy-as-Practice (SaP) perspective, which focuses on the ways in which strategy is actually enacted within organizational settings. This perspective is used to examine the diffusion of lean construction. In recent years lean construction has grown in prominence to become one of the primary performative improvement recipes for the construction sector. However, rather than providing a stable strategy around which more collaborative, intelligent and efficient project-based organizations develop, this research reveals how the lean concept transforms during its journey with unintended organizational consequences. An ethnographic case study, informed by SaP, demonstrates how a lean strategy and its effects on organizational practice and culture cannot be understood separately from material and embodied practices and power effects. As well as contributing to the examination of lean construction practice, the findings show how strategy is enacted within construction organizations and the ensuing effects of social power. A new trajectory is opened for research into strategizing within construction organizations, which provides ways to explore actual practices and spaces where strategizing occurs.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction strategy; contractors; industry change; lean construction; power; reflective practice; strategy-as-practice |
| Index terms: | exploration, construction sector, case study, reflective practice, strategy-as-practice, construction organization, lean construction, project-based organization, strategy |
| Subjects: | environmental resource management, organization, data collection methods, industry analysis, building construction, professional development, management |
| Topics: | Site Management, Organizational Design, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here